https://doi.org/10.67147/literariness.v1i4.097
Epistemology of the Weird: A Neurodivergent Reading of Annihilation’s Ecology
ANANYA S S
PhD Research scholar
Department of English
Pondicherry University, Kalapet, Pondicherry
Mailid: ann0474@pondiuni.ac.in
Abstract: Historically, the term Weird has been used in context of phenomenon that is disruptive in contradiction to what human beings perceive nature should be. There is a total reliance and submission on the fixed laws of nature against the uncertain chaos. Literature conceives it both as an aesthetic category and a stylistic feature in fiction and as a philosophical disposition of the author. This paper argues that weirdness has the potential to offer an alternate model for understanding ecologies in the Anthropocene that opened us to the limitations of the premises of classical neurotypical empiricist methodology. To this end, the idea of weird is reconceptualized as an epistemological category through combining ideas from literary neurodivergent theories and de Feritas and Truman’s understanding of New Empiricisms. By positioning the weird an epistemic point, this paper reintroduces weirdness as a new model of knowing grounded in non-normative sense making to grasp the ecological realities that are unreliable and challenges the normative human-centred logic.
Anthropocene unravels a nature as a super organism that becomes, acts, interacts, intra-acts, mutates, connects and diverges not only at microbial ecological levels but to larger planetary scale, radically challenging all systems of traditional understanding. Speculative literature magnifies these phenomena and introduces them as the ecological “weird” for experimenting and exploring alternate sensory experience by offering a space to interact with strange ontological imaginations. This paper endeavours to understand this through a close reading of Annihilation by Jeff VanderMeer through the theoretical framework of a literary neurodivergent reading characterised by elements that contradicts the neurotypical sensory epistemologies. It provides not only interpretive space but also mirrors the very “strangeness” and instability of ecological realities that surpasses conventional empirical understanding by legitimizing forms of perceptions and rationale that occasionally deviates from normative expectations. The ecology of Area X tears down the sensory making of neurotypical empiricism through a series of ontological anomalies and subversions. The perceptual patterns employed by the explorer trying to make sense of a totally alien and weird world enables a comprehensive apprehension and further assimilation of the looming “weirdness”. To that end, Annihiliation, exemplifies the possibility of a neurodivergent form of observation becoming a necessary epistemic adaptation for understanding ecological weirdness in the Anthropocene further reenforcing the argument that weirdness exceeds the category of aesthetic and into an episteme.
Keywords: Anthropocene, Speculative Fiction, Neurodivergence, Weird Fiction, Ecology, New Empiricism
Read Full Manuscript PDF