https://doi.org/10.67147/literariness.v1i2.057
From Postmodern Skepticism to Selective Credulity: Active Epistemic Resistance in Digital Democracies
ANKITHA K
Independent Researcher, India
Abstract: This paper theorizes the epistemic phenomenon of selective credulity, a condition in which individuals consciously dismiss credible evidence that challenges their existing beliefs, despite exposure to multiple sources. Drawing on postmodern philosophy, digital media theory, and contemporary case studies, the study argues that selective credulity represents a significant shift in the relationship between knowledge, power and digital media. By examining three empirical cases—anti-South Asian narratives, climate change denial and religious polarization in India—the paper demonstrates how digitally networked communication fosters tribal epistemologies that undermine democratic discourse and collective reasoning.
Unlike algorithmic isolation associated with “echo chambers” or “filter bubbles”, selective credulity reflects an active human choice to reject contradictory beliefs in favor of emotional satisfaction. Individuals encountering different ideas often delegitimize them through tribal logic, in which external thoughts are perceived as threats to the survival of their community identities. This epistemic fragmentation, the paper argues, functions as a governance mechanism that keeps people satisfied but rationally neutralized. The study concludes by proposing the concept of “interfacing spaces” for restoring epistemic pluralism and sustaining participatory democracy.
Keywords: selective credulity, echo chambers, algorithmic mediation, postmodern skepticism, epistemic resistance
Read Full Manuscript PDF